Subject	86 is pretty mid 80s :) (n/m)
Posted by	SactoTodd on October 09, 2007 at 11:19 PM
	This message has been viewed 43 times.
In Reply To	For passenger cars it was effective 1986, later for pickups posted by YugoBernie (NoVA) on October 09, 2007 at 11:13 PM
Message
Follow Ups	illegal to shave the third brake light? - 300zx1717 20:21:21 10/09/07 law requires a 3rd brake light (n/m) - Guapo 20:22:21 10/09/07 * Federal Law * (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 20:23:23 10/09/07 Just thinking....I thought only vehicles after 93 had to - 300zx1717 21:00:41 10/09/07 It was a mid 80s law for cars, trucks were added later. (n/m) - SactoTodd 21:03:39 10/09/07 For passenger cars it was effective 1986, later for pickups - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:13:52 10/09/07 86 is pretty mid 80s :) (n/m) - SactoTodd 23:19:16 10/09/07 if i remeber correctly - freak152000 21:12:57 10/09/07 I always thought it was the other way around? - rojoloco (Yokosuka, Japan) 22:17:06 10/09/07 they had something called the US Civil War to decide that. - Guapo 22:26:45 10/09/07 haha (n/m) - ZJeweler 08:50:41 10/10/07 correct. State law always supercedes federal law (n/m) - nemo1080 22:47:00 10/09/07 False. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:09:46 10/09/07 Other way around. That's why the 55mph limit was such a - doug8867 11:01:56 10/10/07 False. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:09:58 10/09/07 Depends on the law. As a general rule - ZiNnYc 11:15:14 10/10/07 stupid federal laws. I wonder if its possible/worth the - 300zx1717 20:28:20 10/09/07 This is actually a law I like. I'm sure it's possible to - Guapo 20:34:36 10/09/07 it isn't stupid at all - aliaZ 20:37:48 10/09/07 Never quite understood how though. - rojoloco (Yokosuka, Japan) 22:21:27 10/09/07 because it's distinctive compared to the 2 rear lights - jzx 22:27:03 10/09/07 studies showed that drivers reacted more quickly to a - aliaZ 22:28:21 10/09/07 Also, - ZXRider(SoCal) 22:32:39 10/09/07 I remember I had to use one of those silly ricer lights once - rojoloco (Yokosuka, Japan) 23:11:59 10/09/07 Who am I to stand in the way of science & studies? lol (n/m) - rojoloco (Yokosuka, Japan) 23:07:55 10/09/07 It was initiated as a "triangle of light". (n/m) - ZiNnYc 11:16:08 10/10/07 Have you ever ... - NytWolf 15:35:41 10/10/07 Unfortunately, I rarely look for the 3rd brake light. - rojoloco (Yokosuka, Japan) 20:54:15 10/10/07 What about a 3rd brake light in the top of the rear window? - BlackholeZ 20:57:21 10/09/07 Spot on. Illegal for any car of any age here, - papariccardoZ 21:31:37 10/09/07 FYI - Here's a place that has a nice selection of hi - jzack 22:57:22 10/09/07 damn that's a lot of red. (n/m) - inf 03:14:22 10/10/07 I assure you that it doesn't look good in real life. - YugoBernie (NoVA) 22:37:29 10/09/07 Who's Z is that? I want to do something similar eventually (n/m) - Aqualung 22:39:34 10/09/07 Please don't. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:02:35 10/09/07 I didn't mean with the brake-light... - Aqualung 23:05:30 10/09/07 BoilerAlum's old Z (n/m) - EricTTZ 23:09:42 10/09/07 Nice Z except for that brake light and the charcoal interior - Aqualung 23:25:45 10/09/07 False - Broke_as_**** 00:05:37 10/10/07 Having owned 2 of them... agreed. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 06:57:23 10/10/07 To each their own I guess... (n/m) - Aqualung 08:01:15 10/10/07 Tan interior sucks (n/m) - EricTTZ 08:14:43 10/10/07 looks incomplete... (n/m) - BoostLesZ 23:38:54 10/09/07 Re: I assure you that it doesn't look good in real life. - got rice? 23:47:38 10/09/07 You can't really tell from that picture... (n/m) - Mr. ZiNGH (SoCal) 23:56:59 10/09/07 Yes I can. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 07:03:15 10/10/07 What if someone used a black decal, like the stock 90-93 tt? - TriniTT 11:29:29 10/10/07 Would certainly look better then having the "blunted" off - YugoBernie (NoVA) 15:22:36 10/10/07 Federal DOT regulations require it on any pass. car built - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:12:10 10/09/07 Shave it and install another one inside top rear glass! - qcsolo 11:19:17 10/10/07 State Laws only superceed Federal Law if it is stricter. - rufflez 15:17:39 10/10/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.